No comments yet

Windrush Deportation Row

Anthony Bryan, who came to Britain from Jamaica in 1965, has been detained twice

Labour is calling on the government to explain who authorised the destruction of thousands of landing cards containing information about Windrush migrants from the Caribbean.
It emerged that cards belonging to migrants were destroyed by the Home Office in 2010.
Labour said this was “truly shocking”.

The Home Office said the landing cards would not have proved an individual had lived in the UK and that keeping them could have broken data protection laws.

Meanwhile officials are investigating dozens of new migration cases relating to the Windrush generation amid mounting criticism of the government.

The Home Office said it was looking at 49 cases as a result of calls it received on Tuesday.
The continuing row concerns the so-called Windrush generation, who arrived in the UK from the Caribbean as children in the first wave of Commonwealth immigration 70 years ago, often on their parents’ passports.
Changes to migration rules mean those who lack documents are now being told they need evidence to continue working, access key services or even remain in the UK.

A look back at life when the Windrush generation arrived in the UK
This is what happened to 60-year-old Anthony Bryan. He lost his job when he received a letter informing him he had no right to remain in the UK.
He says: “It was a shock because I have always thought I was legal, I was British. I have been here from when I was eight. I didn’t give it another thought.”
Mr Bryan, who came to Britain from Jamaica in 1965, was held in a detention centre twice for nearly three weeks last year.
He has since been given leave to remain, but is still waiting for legal paperwork to confirm his right to stay.

‘An impossible goal’

To understand what’s gone on here it’s worth remembering that the rules that now seem overly draconian and unnecessarily burdensome were conceived in a particular political climate.
In the days of the coalition, the government’s target of getting net immigration down to below 100,000 seemed pretty much unachievable. But the then-Prime Minister, David Cameron, had told voters in 2010 that he would cut immigration or deserve to be kicked out.

Theresa May was the politician charged with trying to meet what seemed an impossible goal.
The hunt was then on, under her leadership at the Home Office, to try to find every single possible way that could cut the levels of immigration, whether cracking down on people coming here illegally, or dealing with the problem of over-staying – where people came to the UK to study or work on time-limited visas but stayed.
Of course, neither of those categories relate to the Windrush generation, but they meant that slowly but surely government policy towards anyone whose status might be unclear or undocumented became tighter and tighter.


A Home Office spokesman said the registration slips provided details of an individual’s date of entry, “not any reliable evidence relating to ongoing residence in the UK or their immigration status”.
Under the Data Protection Act 1998, the Home Office – like others – has a legal obligation to ensure that the personal data it holds is not kept for longer than is necessary.

Post a comment

%d bloggers like this: